Illinois Ranks 41st in Freedom

By
Published: June 20, 2011
Illinois Ranks 41st in Freedom thumbnail

For trampling on the liberty of its citizens, Illinois has won the unfortunate distinction of being among the worst states in the nation according to a new study by George Mason University’s Mercatus Center. “Freedom in the 50 States” ranked Illinois 41st in regards to the overall personal and financial freedom its citizens enjoy. The Center rated states in four areas: fiscal policy, regulatory policy, economic freedom, and personal freedom. Illinois ranked 26th in fiscal freedom, 27th in regulatory freedom, 29th in economic freedom, and 49th in personal freedom. For those of us concerned about individual liberty, this does not bode well.

The Mercatus study measured dozens of variables and looked at more than 150 distinct public policies, including social and personal freedoms such as the right to educate your children, to own and carry firearms, and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizure. New Hampshire and South Dakota were found to have the highest amount of overall freedom for their citizens, while New York ranked dead last. That means, in the past several years, Illinois has moved away from the libertarian policies of states like New Hampshire and toward the big-government policies of states like New York, New Jersey, and California.

Heavy tax burdens decrease economic freedom by reducing the amount of discretionary income you have to spend, and some of these taxes, such as the gasoline and cigarette tax, hit the poor particularly hard. In this regard, New Hampshire and New York are a stark contrast. New Hampshire has neither a state sales tax nor income tax, although it does tax dividends and gambling winnings. It taxes gasoline at only 19.6 cents per gallon and cigarettes at $1.78 cents per pack. New York, on the other hand, has a top income tax rate of 8.97 percent and a sales tax of 4 percent, with an option for local and cities governments to add up to 5 percent on top of that. It taxes gasoline at 44.4 cents per gallon and cigarettes at $4.35 cents per pack. We know in which direction our legislators would like to take Illinois, but in which direction would you like to see our state move?

Illinois’ aversion to personal freedom is particularly troubling. According to the Mercatus Center, Illinois ranks second-to-last in that category. The Center defined personal freedom as the ability of a person to dispose of his or her life, liberty, and property as he or she sees fit, as long as he or she does not infringe on the rights of others. This includes laws regulating such diverse things as education, tobacco, alcohol, gambling, gun ownership, auto and road regulations, asset-forfeiture, and arrests for victimless crimes. Victimless crimes are often defined as infractions of criminal law without any identifiable evidence of an individual (other than the perpetrator) having suffered damage in the infractions.

For decades, many cities in Illinois, such as Chicago and Oak Park, have fought to deprive citizens of their Second Amendment rights. Between 1982 and 2010, the City of Chicago banned the possession of handguns outright, until forced to remove that restriction when the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and then ruled that decision applied to the states in McDonald v. Chicago (2010). Chicago still requires all firearms to be registered with the local police department. Both the concealed carry and open carry of firearms is illegal in Illinois, a policy that is currently being challenged in court by the Second Amendment Foundation.

According to the Mercatus Center, Illinois’ victimless crime arrest rates are “almost unfathomable.” They found that in 2008, excluding juveniles, more than two percent of our population was arrested for a victimless crime, mostly for marijuana use and possession. The arrest of individuals for marijuana-related offenses has become big business for the state in the form of “asset-forfeiture.” Illinois asset-forfeiture laws are some of the worst in the nation. In asset-forfeiture cases, police seize and sell the property of individuals suspected of drug offenses, regardless of whether they have been convicted of a crime. No warrant is needed. The state needs only to show probable cause, and if you believe your property has been wrongly seized, you bear the burden of proving your innocence. Law enforcement keeps 90 percent of the proceeds for any sales of seized property.

High taxes, burdensome regulation, and a legislature willing to disregard the personal liberties of its citizens all combine to drag Illinois down into the bottom half of the nation in regards to the freedom its citizens enjoy. In its recent study, the Mercatus Center listed several policy recommendations to improve Illinois’ freedom ranking: Allow the state minimum wage to revert to the federal standard, decriminalize marijuana, repeal the Salvia ban, and end partisan elections for the state supreme court. But these recommendations hardly scratch the surface. On one hand, Illinois needs a legislature and governor willing to stop meddling in the affairs of its citizens. On the other, we need to end the addiction to spending that drives high taxes and the abuse of asset-forfeiture laws. Only then can we begin to roll back the laws that have made Illinois so inhospitable to liberty.

——————–

Michael Kleen is the Editor-in-Chief of Untimely Meditations, former publisher of Black Oak Presents, and proprietor of Black Oak Media. He holds a M.A. in History and M.S. in Education, and is the author of the brand new audiobook “The Creeping Hand of the State” and Other Reflections on America’s Orwellian Future, among other works.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

  1. Danny says:

    Holy cow it’s even worse than I would have guessed.

  2. Old Fart says:

    This state is ran like a communists dictatorship and my opinion is that the people of this state will be the only thing that could ever change that….doubt that anything will ever change because the majority will sit back and do nothing because they dont care or are scared to make something happen.  The need strongly exists for either some fresh blood in all public offices or a complete overthrow either would suit me fine!

    • I’m still holding out for Kentucky to invade Illinois.

      • Old Fart says:

        I was thinkin more like the Juggs.  Illinois already has the civil unions legalized and these folks seem to want to go against the grain of normality as much as possible and the legislators are buyin into it and besides Illinois isnt curvy enough for a kentuckian to want to take lol!  Since our friends the Juggs like the place so well and come to do no more than raise hell I’m placing my bets on them being the take over or something close to their group.  We are running off all business with higher than average tax rates so the legislators must be wanting deadbeats to live here, since they dont seem to be promoting any new business and jobs to this state.

      • Old Fart says:

        Just make sure they are reflective signs you know that’s the new kick from the state guidelines

    • Danny says:

      I feel strongly compelled to make some signs to put up at New Harmony, Mt. Carmel, Vincennes, Hutsonville and west of Terre Haute.

      “Welcome to Illinois. There are 48 other states you could be entering that are more likely to honor your rights under the United States Constitution.”

  3. Anonymous says:

    In the City of Chicago last year they had 435 murders yet we who live in the deep southern counties where there haven’t been 5 murders in the last ten years get the same draconian gun laws forced on us. It is obvious that the strict gun laws don’t work in Chicago, why do they want to institute them down here on us?
    It is like spanking every child in the class because one refuses to behave.

  4. Anonymous says:

    In the City of Chicago last year they had 435 murders yet we who live in the deep southern counties where there haven’t been 5 murders in the last ten years get the same draconian gun laws forced on us. It is obvious that the strict gun laws don’t work in Chicago, why do they want to institute them down here on us?
    It is like spanking every child in the class because one refuses to behave.

    • Jack Howser says:

      If the legislators in Illinois north of I-70 knew how many people had been killed down here with ball-peen hammers, they’d outlaw those, too…

      • Old Fart says:

        Why not outlaw motorcycles and other dangerous forms of transportation while we are at it too?  HEHEHE See I said this is like a communist dictatorship and we really arent that far from it…Just a little over 20 yrs ago we outlawed 3 wheelers because people were to stupid to ride them correctly but yet we allow motorcycles with two wheels anywhere but the interstate highways…just wonderin how this makes sense? 

        • Anonymous says:

          Hey now, we love our Harley!  NOTHING makes sense anymore, SERIOUSLY, Old Fart.

          • Old Fart says:

            I know sweets and for the record, I loved 3 wheeler riding also and was never hurt on one…guess I wont ever be since  you cant buy em anymore!  I have two cousins and an uncle that ride their motorcycles alot and thru the years they had lots of accidents including several broken bones…so I was just applying the same principle to these items as guns…I wouldnt worry there will be a law to make all of you wear helmets before they outlaw them LOL.   I am such a lover of the seat belt law to…yet another form of insurance company dictatorship all across our country.  Nothing makes sense but its all being done where the money switches hands I have noticed that much and if the insurance companies want to be rid of bikes like they did three wheelers…look out.  The only reason they havent outlawed bikes or pushed to is because they are making a fortune off of insurance policies.  Since three wheelers werent road legal there was not policies being sold for them thus creating a headache everytime a dumba$$ wrecked one doing something it wasnt intended to do.  Makes as much sense as legalizing abortion then a few months later a hospital wont let you leave their place without a pumpkin seat…what kinda theology is being used there.  I can explain the three wheeler and motorcycle issue to a T but that one I havent figured out.  Dont think I am against keepin my babies safe cuz I’m not but just wonderin why they feel they have to be in charge of how I choose to keep em safe is beyond belief!  BTW I really enjoy chattin with you on here and hearing you are laughin makes me wanna reply even more.   

          • Anonymous says:

            I know what you’re saying Old Fart! I DO wear a helmet on the bike for as much safety as possible. Totally agree with on all the other too. I watch in all directions while on the bike. I remember when I was younger and would jump on one of our horses, then get bucked off!!!! Dang!!!!! That hurt landing…so I am very cautious with everything. I enjoy chattin with you as well and Thank You for making me laugh every chance you get the opportunity to do so!!!!!

          • Anonymous says:

            I know what you’re saying Old Fart! I DO wear a helmet on the bike for as much safety as possible. Totally agree with on all the other too. I watch in all directions while on the bike. I remember when I was younger and would jump on one of our horses, then get bucked off!!!! Dang!!!!! That hurt landing…so I am very cautious with everything. I enjoy chattin with you as well and Thank You for making me laugh every chance you get the opportunity to do so!!!!!

          • Old Fart says:

            Well it is a good idea to be safe but what I can’t stand is when someone tells me youu better put on that belt or im gonna write u a ticket makes me say stuff like get to writing.

        • Anonymous says:

          Hey now, we love our Harley!  NOTHING makes sense anymore, SERIOUSLY, Old Fart.

  5. Anonymous says:

    Jack, here’s an idea.  Let’s use the eastbound lane of I 70 and everything south and secede and become Northern Kentucky.  The westbound lane north is Illinois.  Downstate values are more like theirs than Chicago-entitlement land.  Besides there is not a community in new Northern Kentucky that needs  Community Organizers like the communities of new Illinois.  What do you think, can we use The Disclosure as succession headquarters? LMAO!!!

You must be logged in to post a comment.