Latest in the judge’s husband’s concubine saga
WILLIAMSON CO.—Aw. Poor lil narcissistic TV gal got a ticket.
Gotta wonder if her current beau will try to pull strings to get her out of it….now that she’s living in Benton and all those attorneys over there are thick as thieves. And I do mean that.
Christen Craig, of Channel 3, is in a snit over our coverage of her current boyfriend’s philandering. She can’t seem to understand that we have no interest in her issue other than she’s boinking the husband of a judge in our circuit (one we hope will no longer be a judge come 2012, but that’s not the point). She, like other peripheral people of the subjects of our coverage, seems to think we have some kind of perverse interest in her. She’s sadly mistaken, but that’s how narcissists are: Nothing is about ANYTHING unless it’s about them. She’ll probably learn when we find out who it was Bryan Drew was boinking the week before his marriage to his current spouse, the judge. If she doesn’t learn from that, she may learn when Bryan drops her like a hot potato for the next concubine.
In the meantime, Christen’s divorce from her hubby Casey has been moved, as of Dec. 21, to St. Clair County. Good thing we know the fine people in that courthouse and venture over there periodically; we can keep up with things in that way….even if Bryan Drew IS her ‘attorney of record’ for the divorce.
Short URL: http://www.disclosurenewsonline.com/?p=5638













Nothing will come of this. The ticket was just for No Insurance…I’m sure they have insurance on the vehicle. She’ll provide proof of insurance and it’ll be dismissed. However, you’ll notice that’s the only ticket she received…no probable cause citation issued. I’d be interested to know what she was actually stopped for…
One of those things we may never know….unless someone just happens to be tooling over to Benton here pretty soon…
Well, if you can get her to talk…the public would like to know. Or at least I would.
We wouldn’t go talk to her….we’d just find out which officer issued the ticket, then foia for a report on why he stopped her.
An insurance ticket that will undoubtedly be dismissed tomorrow (and would be for anyone, regardless of whom they’re dating)?
I wonder where she gets the idea that you have some “interest in her”?
Just sayin’…
Oh, prolly because people like you play into her narcissism…
…just sayin.
Hm. Well, FOIA wouldn’t apply I wouldn’t think. If there’s no paper, there’s no public record. Most police agencies do not require a written report on traffic stops, unless something more comes from it. Perhaps the officer wouldn’t feel like talking about it? Perhaps if you pull her citation at the courthouse in Williamson, if you look at the “notations” section, it may notate a verbal warning for an offense….maybe not..
She probably was stopped for reckless driving (going airborne) and 40+ over the limit, but since she’s a big TV star, the cop felt sorry for her and wrote her a ticket she could easily get dismissed.
I just wonder sence you guys brought. This to spot light if she will bring it to spot light on tv 3 when u guys screw up lol
I’m not sure they make a habit of screwing up since they’ve been around this long pissing people off and bringing things to light certain people would rather remain hidden. Good luck; I’m eagerly awaiting Jack’s response.
People like me? I’d never even heard of her until I read about her in the Disclosure.
@errata: except that you continue to perpetuate her fantasy that she means something, when we point out very clearly in each article that she does NOT. Which apparently bugs her, and prompts her to whine about it on her Facebook…which causes people to click on here to see what’s going on….which means she’s good for clicks. So hell yeah, we’re going to mention her in connection with Drew, and Drew in connection with anything that happens to her. Same as we will the next client he screws. New crop of clicks.
@GingerbreadMan: We’d FOIA for the dispatch log. Whatever the reason was for the stop would be on THAT. All we need is the time from the citation. We don’t even need the officer’s name, which would undoubtedly be illegible anyway as most of them scrawl on purpose.
@iptf: When WE screw up, we point it out ourselves before anyone else can. Saves other people the trouble and takes away their thunder. Pisses em off, too; bonus. If you don’t believe it, type “Jade Wingard” or “typos” into the search field on this page and see what you get.
Yeah, I have to say, if she’s ticketed for not having her insurance proof in her car and makes the front page of this blog, with her picture and a headline about the “latest” in her “saga”, I can see how she might think Disclosure might have some interest in her.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. And certainly there wouldn’t be any interest in her if she weren’t “boinking” the judge. But still. Nothing wrong with saying her feelings of being of interest to the Disclosure aren’t entirely narcissistic.
Myself, I’m more interested in the address listed on the ticket. 208 Public Square. The former Wood Bldg. Now Peoples Bank. Nice very expensive condos up above the bank. So… who lives up there… somehow I doubt she could afford to buy one. If I remember right they were at least a quarter mil starting rate. Unless…. Well.. I’m sure in Franklin county some of them are still empty & every leach, I mean lawyer needs to have a banker in their Rolodex. My thoughts anyway… I live about a mile from there. May have to go for an early morning walk & see what’s up. : )
@Jack, the reason for the stop is only on the dispatch log if it was given. Most usually anymore, the reason for the stop isn’t given, unless its given as a disposition, and those are hit and miss as to whether or not they’re given. Not trying to be difficult here, just going with the flow.
I’ve never seen an occurrence where a reason wasn’t given for a stop, especially on a dispatch log. But I appreciate your input for the flow.
@Jack, sometimes people just don’t get how you guys work, do they? They also don’t get or seem to be able to comprehend your reasoning behind putting her picture up. Hell, I may not be the brightest crayon in the box, :aie: but I even know why you do the things you do. I think it is so simple & plain to see from a business point of view, but most people think you MUST HAVE a hidden agenda behind it. You have LITERALLY spelled it out for people & they still don’t get it! It’s called BAIT & LURE, AKA.. Good Business Sense period! Am I right? I mean, really, is she that narcissistic to think that you guys are watching her every move? If so, I think they have meds for that. Don’t get me wrong, I think she is a very beautiful young woman. Beauty is only skin deep but ugly is to the bone. I’m sure she thinks she can change Drew or that he’ll change for her but, statistics prove otherwise, don’t they?
@Jack…if a stop was made you can bet it’s on a dispatch log. I think you’re right about that one, Jack. Just depends on what it says, I guess.
Well, I’ve seen quite a few, myself, made quite a few myself, heard a lot of agencies that don’t, via scanner/radio. Not saying Williamson operates that way, just saying that some agencies actually don’t adhere to that..
Williamson co sometimes they give the reason for the stop sometimes they dont. It all depends on how the officer wants to do it. If the officer feels its no 1s businesses then he wont give 1. This is usually when they have stop a celebrity or judge or another officer
Doesn’t matter, Ang did some research after a tip and learned that Ms Current Concubine was cited after she was rear-ended that night.
No comments about boinking-from-behind here, please.
Not even one Jack? Fooey. Guess that is an almost, too easy target.
Ang absolutely forbade it. She said her source did, too. LOL
You take the fun out of everything!
Yes I do.
That’s my job.
…so perhaps she was pulled over on suspicion of DUI, and upon lackluster results of blowing…oh never mind….
This is just to funny ! Thanks guys I needed the humor tonight ! I always know where to go to find a good laugh !
@LMAO: Thanks! If you want another hoot head on over to the Max Schauf ‘superfulous’ thread, or the ‘croc found in Embarrass River’….Dennis was on a roll yesterday…
I didn’t do it!!!! Russell NY did!! I never made one joke about it……it’s Russells fault…