Underage drinking punks busted AGAIN; we knew it was only just a matter of time
Kaylie C'ASS'tro. Yes, she is as nasty as she looks
Guess who got popped over the weekend in Lawrence County for Unlawful Consumption of Alcohol?
The one on the right is Alisha Schauf. The one on the left is Samantha; she's VERY underage, like 16 or so.
Kaylie Castro and Alisha Schauf (daughter of Bridgeport mayor Max Schauf) were once again caught underage drinking, this time out on highway 50 (where, or whether they were in a vehicle with others who were of-age, is not available in court records) this past Saturday just after 2 in the morning. Both are 19 and both are on court supervision from an incident last August wherein they were also busted for the same thing.
Classy, huh?
Alisha Schauf paid off her fines and fees from the previous conviction, but Castro did not. She’s had one warrant issued for her, which was quashed at the last minute, and is back to operating under ‘pay or appear’ after failing to appear in April. Both were ordered to do community service work; it’s unclear whether they performed this, or whether anyone would have them, especially Castro, what with the smell and all…
...needs no explanation. Of course, this isn't how Sheila Schauf, Alisha's big sister, got preggers.
These sick little kids and their infractions, which will one day lead to the death of one of them or of an innocent driver or pedestrian, since nothing effective is being done with these punks, will be featured in the next issue of Disclosure, on stands June 16.
Short URL: http://www.disclosurenewsonline.com/?p=3345
Posted by Jack Howser
on Jun 3 2010. Filed under Lawrence.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
this seriously makes me sick…why do these kids do stupid shit like this, and consider it ok? I mean, good lord, have some self respect…anyone that would write “rape time” on their chest and hold up a rubber, they need to be sat down and taught how not to be a skank
The strange thing about it is that Castro is obviously being lead to do wrong by the Schaufs because she has people around her who care about her; we’ve been in contact with them over the time she’s been acting up and getting in trouble. She just doesn’t listen. The Schauf kids are just rotten to the core as is their father. There’s no hope for any of them, since he’s the mayor.
And these are the MILD pictures.
I must admit that I take pride in the fact that mayor Schauf spent money to campaign against me when I ran for re-election in 2006.
I’d kick the shiz out of my kid for something like that. WHERE OH WHERE ARE THE PARENTS? I agree, that is SICK. But someone pray tell me, what’s the deal with all the girls in all the pics sticking out their tongues. YUCK. That’s sick too. If they think that’s cute, they think wrong.
We’re not sure where her parents are. If her dad is really a Castro, he’s a felon; for all we know he could be in DOC right now. Not sure where her mom is. Her grandma was trying to raise her and from what we can gather, this grandma is a really decent gal. This kid just got messed up with the wrong people. The Schaufs are all the ‘wrong people’. Because their dad has been mayor since 2001, and is one of the most corrupt, malfeasant politicians we’ve ever beheld, they can behave with impunity while in town, and only get popped when they get outside the jurisdiction. In this case, it was a Lawrence County deputy who got them. We don’t know the full circumstances yet and will be getting them before we go to press.
And I don’t know what the “MySpace/tongue” thing is. These kids seem fascinated with their tongues. There is no sense of decorum or personal pride anymore. It’s truly revolting.
Not only stupid but ugly…and, apparently available to all and sundry. What a disgrace they are!
the samantha in this pic is samantha hixon just so you know lol and shes 17 or 18 she just graduated from red hill high school
“There is no sense of decorum or personal pride anymore.”
Definition of decorum: dignified propriety of behavior.
So what do you call re-publishing a bunch of racy pictures of kids who messed up only to get a rise out of a bunch of near strangers? I wouldn’t say that holds a lot of dignity…
I’d like to know what all of you people were up to when you were their ages…bet you were in church all the time…haha
Actually: I was married, with one child, and proudly serving my country in the Army, where I was sent to conflicts that someone like you can only read about (if you’re so inclined…and most people aren’t). Ang was forwarding her career as a musician, singer and actress, and competed in the Miss Illinois/America pageant before moving on to appear in stage and television along the Gulf Coast for a successful number of years. Both of them are careers that, in the 70s and 80s, if you were successful at what you did, you didn’t A) break the law or B) waste time with screwing up your brain/body with substances. And both of us were very successful. Since you asked. (and yes, as a matter of fact, Ang was in church a LOT. She sang there. Since you asked.)
You impugning lack of decorum upon us for reporting the filth in the area shows your utter ignorance of what news media should be. If other media would shame and scorn the trash like this out there, maybe there’d be less of it. In case you haven’t noticed, this is our JOB. Something these two girls can’t seem to get or keep, btw…how’s YOUR employment situation, kells?
I’m very happy with my job, and I worked very hard to obtain the two degrees it took to get my job. Thanks!
Just to correct something, you said “Since you asked.” Which I didn’t. I merely poked fun at what I was certain would be your answer. And then it was your answer. Which is funny to me. It’s interesting how people justify themselves and their actions over others. It’s usually the same story. That’s all I was trying to say. Thanks for illustrating my point.
It’s also funny how little you know about me, yet you assume that I know nothing about “conflicts” and could only read about them.
I think it was supposed to be “Love thy neighbor,” not “Shame and scorn the trash.”
Or maybe “Judge not lest ye be judged.”
Wow. Amazing how I could say your exact same words back to you: “It’s interesting how people justify themselves and their actions over others.” “It’s also funny how little you know about me”…regardless of what the subject matter is. Which is what you assumed you did when you spat your little comment that got your answer. If you know all about us, why did you even need to make a comment about what we were doing when we were 19? Do tell.
As for scorn: Proverbs 18:3. I can go all day quoting chapter and verse. You apparently are one of those inepts who use Biblical verses to fit your worldview. You don’t want to get into that with me. And believe me I don’t have time for you. I swear the freaks crawl out of the woodwork when we’re in writing week….even those with “two degrees”….
Wow! You sure can go on all day quoting “chapter and verse.” But you didn’t actually address the previous commenter’s thesis, which is that your RELIGION is supposed to PREVENT you from behaving in the way you are, not be a big ol’ cross you can hide behind to do what you want.
And why is the previous commenter a “freak” simply because they don’t agree that it’s really cool to post pictures of underaged kids behaving badly on the Internet?
I can say the same thing about kells’ comments. kells is applying whichever portion of the Bible fits his/her ‘thesis’ at the moment (I’m sure you meant premise, but I’ll give you that one, since it’s apparent YOU’RE drinking the fluoride too, to come to kells’ defense.)
And to address your second graph, at the point that we sit down and produce our print product, for anyone to come on here and question how we do what we do confers freak/jerk/loser/whatever status upon the poster, as there are other places to go to gripe about what we do here. If you don’t like it, leave. It’s as simple as that. Several thousand people a day come here because they DO like it. During writing week, we don’t have time to quabble with the mouth-breathers who defend 19-year-old freaks, who should be shamed out of doing such things, posting such photos of themselves for the entire www to see. We know these kids, we know what they do, we’ve spoken with friends and family who wish they wouldn’t, and the friends and family think it’s GREAT that we go the distance to try and dissuade them, and others like them, from being so @ssholish in their young lives. It has to do with right and wrong. We’re right in exposing them for what they are, and they’re wrong for doing what they do. And isn’t right and wrong what the Bible is all about, since we’re on a religious tangent today?
Back to the woodwork with you.
Thesis: a proposition stated or put forward for consideration.
Also, fluoride is actually good for you–it’s added to drinking water. So we’re ALL kind of drinking it.
I wouldn’t call what you’re doing trying to “dissuade” these girls; you’re more trying to shame them into line with your worldview. Way to go, can’t wait to see if they respond to that. These girls need positive attention and positive role models. What they have is some middle-aged man trolling MySpace searching for pictures of them with their tongues out.
I will, however, let you get back to your LEGION of fans, who ALWAYS agree with you, whether they are able to competently articulate it through the broken English and poor spelling they have at their disposal. Mouthbreathers, indeed.
No, some of us who have deep well water DON’T drink it. And if you believe fluoride is good for you, you’ve been drinking it too long.
No, we’re not shaming them into OUR worldview. It’s common sense, and it’s also THE LAW. They have HAD positive attention and role models; it has done no good. They have attracted more than their share of middle-age men trolling their MySpaces: they have attracted felons in prison sending them love letters, all long before they began breaking the law (which was what brought them into our sphere of consciousness). These little freaks are going to kill someone. It may be someone you know. I dearly hope we are wrong about that, but we are right about bad things, having seen it for as many years as we have in this business. Please mean what you say, even though you are shitty about our supporters.
Please don’t justify your use of big words. You’re not good at it.
Only in Southern Illinois would someone consider “thesis” to be a big word.
And only someone who supports the likes of Castro and Schauf would miss the inference that it wasn’t just ‘thesis’ of which I was speaking.
Isn’t it time for you to go away now?
I don’t “support” them. I think they seem like stupid kids. But luckily, they still have time to grow into responsible, balanced adults.
Unfortunately, it seems a little too late for you.
No, they’re pretty set in their ways, especially the Schaufs. That whole family is messed up, and the lack of control displayed by these types of kids these days generally only escalates as time goes on.
Good try on the zinger, but again, you fail.
I thought it was pretty funny.
Maybe that girl needs to be raped and then see how she fucking feels when they dont use a rubber and shes got some nasty std or a baby!
Yeah! Rape ‘em into good behavior! Woo hoo! That’ll show those little tarts! Maybe we could nail Syphilis brochures to their hands and make them walk down Main Street while we’re at it!
You are a troglodyte.
Symantech….think.
I believe our post commenter was trying to say that this little tart probably hasn’t the foggiest clue what a real rape is like…and to treat it as lightly as to decorate herself so and shoot a photo of it for www consumption is a slap in the face to anyone who HAS been raped.
Apparently you’ve never know anyone who’s suffered such a thing, either. I have. And I am offended by it for the person I know who has been raped. For someone to use it in such a sick way to obtain her perverted form of ‘attention’ shows not only naivete and ignorance, but quite possibly a mental problem, and most certainly a lower functioning IQ level than normal.
Think before you post.
Actually, I have indeed known people who have been raped; that’s why I found the previous poster’s response so ugly.
We don’t live in a culture where you can say something like “Maybe that girl needs to be raped and then see how she fucking feels” and expect it to be read as “That girl sure needs to think before she acts!”
I notice you are not prompting the “she should get raped” poster to “think before they post.” From which I can only glean that that sort of comment is acceptable to you. Perhaps specifically because it is so ugly?
Symmie…I’ve been watching from which Facebook page you’ve been jumping. We have that capacity here. It’s called ‘referral.’
I’ve also been tracking your IP. It repeatedly comes up from a location in Texas. I know for a fact that most of Bridgeport’s internet service providers, and a good portion of Lawrenceville’s, tracks back to the same Texas location.
I have reason to believe you are one of the trashy punks, or a proxy thereof since their intellect isn’t high enough to make such post comments, featured in this article. I have placed your other personas in the trash because A) i can, I own the website, and B) you are being disruptive and we’re not featuring anyone taking up for the filth these children spew any longer, especially on deadline.
I’m going to politely ask you to leave the conversation of your own accord. You know what you are defending is wrong, and if you don’t, you need to get a damn quick education. Children shouldn’t be first of all allowed to post such trash of themselves online and secondly, if they violate the law and we choose to report on it, shouldn’t be here bitching to high heaven about our right to do so in whatever manner we see fit.
We have reason to believe these kids are sick and twisted, and are troublemakers in a town where they are allowed to continue in their course of action unchecked. They are going to kill someone one day. I hope it isn’t someone you care about.
And God help them if it’s someone I care about.
If saying it’s inappropriate to suggest that a nineteen-year-old girl shouldn’t be threatened with rape is “wrong,” then I don’t wanna be right.
And you know I’m not coming from Facebook, either. Nor am I a teenager. Nor am I “taking up for these children” or the “filth they’re spewing.” I’m simply one person suggesting it’s ludicrous to fight the supposed filth THEY’RE spewing by suggesting a good raping is what they need.
You’re right, though, I am in Texas. Even this place is more progressive than where I came from, apparently.
Now, please. Go ahead and block me. You seem to do that to anyone who is intelligent enough to point out how backwards you are. And please, by all means, get back to that pressing “deadline.” (I wasn’t aware self-promoted blogs HAD deadlines, but what do I know about the inner workings of made-up media sources?)
Don’t let the door hitcha, “Texan.” Referrals don’t lie, and we can’t make them up.
We don’t need ‘progressives’ here, either. And in case you couldn’t read when you were on the “About us” page, the deadline is for a print version…which most of our readers already know…but then, I’ve already invited you to keep your ill-informed opinions to yourself.
Hot dang!
“Rape time” is a 4chan meme. Don’t worry if you’re confused.
Let me assure that “rape time” rarely means actually having sex in /b/tard culture. Most of the time it’s written “can haz raep tiem noa plz?” or something to that effect. Usually it means that someone is being pwnd: pronounced “poned”. What’s “pwnd”, you ask? It’s l33tspeak for “owned”: domination or defeat…almost 100% of the time used in an online argument since rarely do these /b/tards meet up IRL.
So, Stupid Kaylie is stupid. She’s using “raep tiem” in the wrong context. If she were truly /b/ then she would have written something like ” ‘sup /b/ ” on her chest and posted her naked boobs to insinuate sex. She looks like a skank so they would have vilified her online.
Lest we think these kids are toataly useless, remember that /b/tards don’t just sit in their parents’ basements on computers. They’ve tracked down and brought pedophiles and animal abusers to justice. They’re also responsible for Project Chanology, the anti-Scientology movement and are for the most part, they are vehemently against governments trying to harness the internet.
Let’s not be too high and mighty with our opinions of their slang. We all had our slang words when we were young and most of it was offensive to older people. We all grow out of it.
And let’s all hope that Kaylie’s fail pic doesn’t end up being fed to the chans somehow.
I’m familiar with the Channers. Kudos to them on the anti-Scientology and anti-animal abusers angle!
It does appear that that was a FAIL on her part. She’s just trying to get a rise out of us. She referenced me (as in “Jack Howser look at this”) when she posted it on her MySpace. I only grabbed the pic because I knew she’d get arrested again and we always need fresh art.
We were informed that she’s on topix.net pretending to be someone all wise in the ways of how the ‘net works, dissing our use of ‘referrals’ in our response to her on here. I had to ask the emailer to send a screen shot as topix’s ads crash our browser everytime, very annoying. She’s pretending referrals don’t bounce our screen back to where the user was before they landed on our website. I about choked laughing at the naivete. Just about EVERY website has a referral capacity; it’s a way to let the siteowner know where people who are looking at our site are coming from: a search engine like Google, their email program (meaning we’re one of the first sites they check after they check their email), our Facebook page when we put up a link, a place we advertise like RumorMillNews, etc. It could be a link in a bookmark chain a person has set up and that they scroll through when they’re cruising the web daily. It’s a tool websites use to determine where their traffic is coming from so they can target certain audiences and set prices for ads. It’s very basic; we have used it for months since it was shown to us by our IT guy; we’re fascinated by it. And the CONSTANT referral on that particular post, until a couple of days ago, bounced right off Kaylie Castro’s Facebook. If I knew how to run video of the screens and clicks involved in tracking back the referral, I’d do it just to show everyone.
What a bunch of losers.
ITT Kaylie doesn’t understand how to internet? ORLY?
Doesn’t understand how referrals work?
lolololol
Epic Fail, Kaylie!!!!11!!!!1!!
It’s a series of tubes.
I think she understands, herself, I just think she’s trying to convince everyone else that there’s NO WAY we could have found out that she was jumping off her Facebook page to what’s obviously a bookmarked page (this one) by the referral process.
I probably need to put up the screenshot I was sent so you can see what I mean. She was all trying to convince these other people who hate us that WE don’t know what WE’RE talking about.
Maybe we need you on staff, /b/ !
Rape Time (slang) for get powned… we also say get raped. not meaning actually go get raped or that we wanna be raped.. meaning we rock or kick ass. so there end this war goin on between you guys. its just something we say. were kids having fun … not goin to kill anyone or ourselves and just to let you know we have all calmed down got jobs stay in and play board games or xbox… im gettin pretty good at monopoly ha .. we got busted at our last party … we all decided to calm down … get over it almost everyone drank at our ages . we just always get talked about.. i wouldnt post stuff onp my page but you see i know that when i got in trouble you guys would be checking my page out … anyways have a great night im goin four wheeler riding … its all over with let it go … i dont want to have a on going war. neither one of us will win . ignore my way of typing .
That whole thing somehow puts me in mind of Paul McSparin…
….going to check out IPs, brb…
I’m back. Deff not Pauliegirl’s. We’ll see if you kids calm down. More power to ya if you do.
im not trying to be a smartass either … im seriously over it …
Alisha actually has never been in trouble before … she was not at the party in aug when her sister and i got busted … i swear … she is a very nice girl and this was her first time getting in trouble i ubderstand you guys talkin about me but please dont talk bad about her … i dont want to fight with you ill take everything off my myspace. could you guys please not put us back in your paper unnless we get in trouble again ?
Yeah, that was actually a typo and I need to fix it in the online article. I saw that the other day. However, we were told she was at the August party, along with Mark. If they weren’t, they weren’t. we don’t know who all for certain were there.
And no, we don’t reference you until you get in trouble, just like we told you in an email last year, so if you don’t violate the law, you won’t see your name in print or on this website again…it’s that easy. We put our own kids’ names in print when they get in trouble; we’re not going to leave anyone else out. But if you don’t get in trouble again, you got yourself a deal.
Ok for the record I’m samantha hixon and I’m 18 and I wasn’t even there ….notice how I didn’t get cited … and last party got busted I blew 0.0 so facts need to be checked before I’m thrown around a paper for being an out of control teen …
And if you don’t reference people til they get in trouble why am I in there …only time I was in court was to defer a speeding ticket …I think that its very inappropriate…do your research next time please
Oh and btw alisha schauf is not a bad person. People do have the ability to make wrong choices that doesn’t mean she is a bad person. And people also have the ability to learn from mistakes. If you keep saying “there is no hope for the schaufs” they will start thinking maybe there isn’t. And conform to what your saying. It’s called growing up. But before they can you exploit them. And same for kaylie Castro I saw them today in probably 6 months
(Yes I haven’t hung around them in a long time ) and she has grown up …(sorry about the two comments my phone is junk ).
Samantha, they exploited themselves FIRST. They didn’t have to take such pics of themselves, they didn’t have to post them, they didn’t have to get in trouble, and then when they did get in trouble, they didn’t have to give us shit about it on an unending basis. But they did all that. And they got it back—in SPADES. Karma’s a bitch, eh?
And btw I also know that you were the one who was texting another girl telling her you were at the mayor’s house drinking last fall. That just another one of your “growing-up mistakes”? I’d suggest you learn from them and stop making them. Even at 18. And THAT incident would be why you were mentioned here.
Yes and that girl moving to Florida because her boyfriend got thrown in jail for emblezzment. And those messages were taken out if context I had to show the real messages …so let’s not go there . They were meth junkies and her boyfriend tried to kill her…and my messages didn’t get me into trouble I haven’t done anything wrong …besides trust wrong people …yet that makes me deliquent
Only in your own mind.
Apparently sitting in the mayor’s house slugging back Jaeger at 17 or 18 is perfectly okay with you. And bear in mind, NO ONE got arrested that night. Not for lack of trying, though.
Oh and was it reported that I was thst I was even present at the mayors house ..no sir
Was it ever reported that I was even at the mayors ..no sir *
No. Because we were respecting using the name at that time, hoping you’d talk to us about it once you saw your texts in print. You didn’t, but you just confirmed that that was you, saying you were drinking Jaeger bombs at the mayor’s house. You did it, so you’re outed. End of story.
So you are saying I am in this issue because a year ago you published some of my text messages that were brought to you by a crack heads …who were hell bent on trying to make Derek Blair look like a saint cuz he was their weed dealer..hmm..good sources
No. I’m saying your pic is on this website because you A) associated with another underage kid, who happens to be the kid of a public official, who got in trouble for underage drinking and B) YOU were underage drinking with this same kid about six months ago, not a year ago, and at this public official’s house. All of which is NEWS which YOU just confirmed for us. We thank you. Stop trying to use defensive tactics to change the subject; that may work on your poor parents, but it doesn’t work here.
Uh why would I go to you …what I thought ( at that time )my words were already twisted .. I didn’t want that to happen again …
Oh, I dunno……maybe you’d want to STRAIGHTEN IT OUT?
Just sayin. Lots of people do, you know. We’ve got straight texts that we saw with our own eyes…I don’t think straight texts can be altered, and they can’t be taken out of context, either, if they’re STRAIGHT (in other words, sequential. Big word, I know. Look it up.)
First off .. if it wasnt ever confirmed why did you publish them in the first place? Bad reporting . And yes they were my messages but some of the messages were deleted and some from a whole different day … and no I was not underage drinking BECAUSE I WASN’T THERE
Yes it was confirmed, by your phone number on the texts. How dense…? nevermind. I guess you just made up the part about the Jaeger bombs.
You are contradicting yourself and wasting my time. Go away.
Yes . You have a bigger vocabulary than me. Congratulations.here’s a cookie
At least you acknowledge it. I’ll pass on the cookie, don’t know where it’s been…now go away. For real.
Why do you do all this crap? You obviously have no life lol
Kiddo, your name says it all.